Pure signal.

afraid for my nation

I am somewhat frightened for the soul of my nation. You might think I am being dramatic, you might accuse me of being dim-witted for taking so long, but the occasion of my fright is specific and I would like to detail it before I am subject to your ready judgments and insults.

A well-written young adult novel with a strong female lead and a theme of the value of free will is being touted as being atheistic/satanic and a corrupter of children’s values. The book itself is a fairy tale, and at it’s darkest it perhaps goes as far as the story of Job — it warns against arbitrary authority, the mistaking of a powerful leader for God, and asserts that for good to truly be done, it must be done by a free will. Admittedly, this last point is revolutionary — it led to protestantism… some hundreds of years ago.

If people feel the need to protect their children from this message, then I shudder to think of what world they are preparing those children for. I wonder if the myth of the suicide bomber (and by myth I do not mean that there are not suicide bombers, but rather the whole collection of stories about them, and pictures and movies and so on) has elicited a kind of guilt on the part of our own religious leaders. Their flocks are not capable of such devotion. Not that I think anyone is thinking this consciously, as I said, I fear for the soul of my nation, not it’s mind.

The movie is The Golden Compass — a first class adventure story that takes place in a universe consisting of fantastic elements from modern science fiction (the concept of multiple universes), and old fairy stories (talking animals, witches and familiar creatures) combined in a moral universe which might have come from Dickens. There is a rigid and authoritarian power structure, which is viewed cynically (in the tradition of all folk writing) and numerous autonomous societies attempting to live within it. The balance between these societies is shifting and governed by negotiation. The center of this imaginary world is a structure that bears a great deal of resemblance to the medieval church. In the book it is a bad thing.

But it was a bad thing, right? It is not defaming of Catholics to observe that having burned people alive for promoting the experimental method was wrong, is it? Surely having burned complete cities (some under their own jurisdiction) is still viewed as having been, well, extreme, right? Or maybe that kind of zeal is something we shouldn’t be so quick to judge, because we might need it for the burgeoning clash of cultures we are supposedly engaging in.

Well, some of them are saying that this characterization of the church promotes atheism. Which sounds a great deal to me like the argument Cat Stevens made when he advocated for Salman Rushdies death after that author wrote a book condemning negative aspects of Islam. His Dark Materials (a title taken from Milton) is highly intelligent, but hardly revolutionary. It is as anarchist as Huck Finn, and as atheist as Meister Eckhart — which is, honestly, not very. It is as anarchist as the heart of it’s audience, the young adult. It characterizes the bonds of love and loyalty, the living quilt of society, as superior to the bonds of fear and obedience. At some point in the last 33 years, when my back was turned, did this concept become radical?

Because when I was 6 years old, and reading Sinbad, it was fucking obvious.


December 10, 2007 - Posted by | Uncategorized

1 Comment »

  1. I had ignored the Golden Compass books. I thought they were more jump on the bandwagon bullshit hacked out by a no-talent asshole and shoved into the marketplace in a callous attempt to cash in on the Harry Potter craze. Of course, I faithfully read the goddamned Potter books, unaware the author actually WAS as shitty as I assumed the Golden Compass author and publisher to be…

    So, the first time I really payed much attention was when the movie started being advertised. Even then I didn’t care. SO many of these things get made… I liked the big polar bears, but…

    Then I saw a few of the articles relating how the “Christians” were all in a huff about it: how it was a “veiled attempt at indoctrinating our children” or some other batshit crazy bullshit. I read and watched with interest now. These books were, basically an “athiests” answer to CS Lewis’ Narnia tripe. The author despises Lewis and his own thinly veiled religious allegories. He wanted to write something in response from a more “secular” perspective.

    Now… I don’t remember the Narnia movie getting one tiny bit of press regarding scientists or atheists or anyone else for that matter complaining about how Lewis’ Narnia is any kind of attempt at indoctrinating anyone into the slave morality of Christ. Did I miss it? What?

    Logan and I liked the Narnia movie. It was kinda neat. I liked the book when I was a kid. Who gives a shit if it’s the same story as Jesus? Jesus’ followers stole his story from Osiris, etc. anyway. What’s the big deal. It’s a cool archetype. Total bullshit, but a cool archetype.

    The Golden Compass, on the other hand, appears at first glance, to actually be a usefull and relevant allegory relating to the HERE and NOW rather than an outdated, recycled, irrelevant ancient myth. It appears to be dealing with the complications of Free Will in a world without imaginary friends on high. THAT’s bad-ASS!

    I will be taking Logan to the theater for this one. I’m hoping to indoctrinate him.

    Comment by Chuk! | December 14, 2007 | Reply

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: